Smoke
9 Responses to Smoke
Leave a Reply to jan Cancel reply
Current Top Ten
- 1. Preparation
- 2. Häagen-Bot
- 3. Easter Tradition
- 4. Apocalypse Meow
- 5. It's A Mystery
- 6. Ghosts
- 7. Rex
- 8. Why A.I.?
- 9. Yard Sign
- 10. A.I. and Art
Categories
Popular Topics
3x4 3x5 3x6 3x7 3x8 3x9 3x10 Battle Bear Business Cat Christmas Communication Danger Death Dog Doug Savage Drinking Fear Food Health Internet Language Lazy Life Love Management Movies Music Nature Optimism Parenting Pirate Productivity Psychology Robot Science Sleep Star Wars Superhero Television Time Tree Work ZombieAdventures in Comics
To see what else I'm up to, visit me at www.dougsavage.com.
(sigh) If only the world worked that way.
PSA Today
Should this be “If you only exhale?”
because “Only if you exhale” doesn’t exclude inhaling. You can inhale and exhale.
I guess I don’t get the “joke/point” here, because I’m under the assumption that inhaling the smoke is what’s bad for you so “if you only exhale” would seem to be the healthiest option.
but then “If you only inhale” would probably be the worse option, so if that’s what is commonly done than yes, “allowing” exhaling of the smoke would improve your health… I’m probably overthinking this, aren’t I?
Inhaling smoke is bad for the box, but exhaled smoke is bad for the chicken?
I think the smoke that comes from the tip is more harmful, though – but it doesn’t get blown in your face!
or maybe “only if you only exhale”
haha nothing like a good grammar analysis! To be clearer, the chicken could be saying “I mind only if you exhale” 🙂
Oh, haha! That had not occurred to me in my overthinking…
How about “I wouldn’t even mind if you burned”?
Best cartoon of the year 2017! Thanks for my new response to this question.