11 Responses to The Problem
Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply
Current Top Ten
- 1. Meteor
- 2. Reassurance
- 3. Strange Bunny
- 4. Trouble Sleeping
- 5. Very Important
- 6. The Art of Setting Realistic Goals
- 7. The Right Amount
- 8. No Gifts
- 9. Return of Tarp Ghost
- 10. Doom Response
Categories
Popular Topics
3x4 3x5 3x6 3x7 3x8 3x9 3x10 Battle Bear Cat Christmas Communication Danger Death Dog Doug Savage Drinking Fear Food Future Goals Internet Language Lazy Life Love Management Movies Music Nature Optimism Parenting Pirate Productivity Psychology Robot Science Sleep Star Wars Superhero Television Time Tree Work ZombieAdventures in Comics
To see what else I'm up to, visit me at www.dougsavage.com.
I was going to asked why 21n^2n wasn’t simplified to 21n^3, but I now realize that 1 was an l. (and then I flashed back to the freshman calculus class I taught where someone simplified (sin x)/x = sin.)
It’s stuff like that that made me always do a cursive l when I did math. And put a line through my zs.
Wow. wouldn’t conversation be amazing if it was like that.
‘I say Roger, the Sum total of 1 over 1 to the minus n multiplied by 1 to the minus n’ is equal to just 1 don’t you know?’
‘Why no! How very intersting. How very interesting squared infact…’
Mary Pat – that was way to much information! But can you tell me the square root of a right triangle times the widith of a 3 year old Oak Tree in a Moutain Range 3 Million Years old, time the radius of a quadrilateral’s 5th dimention, plus all of space and time divided by X?
If math is a foreign language, then I’m using the tourist dictionary. I do good just to use the basic functions of the whole mess. I’m still trying to figure out how I passed high school algebra with a B…I don’t remember getting grades that high!
The answer is 42.
What Mary said. I used to write the “ln” in cursive to indicate natural log to keep things clear. Anyway, I don’t remember that equation at MIT. We didn’t advance into chicken math.
Something’s wrong with the look on that chicken’s face…
She’s hallucinating!
Shouldn’t there be an m on the right hand of the equation or did I miss it in the chicken scratch writing of the equation?
Anon 11:47 – no there shouldn’t. This is a series, meaning you substitute a number where you see an m on the lefthand side of the equation, starting at m=3 and going to m=(n/2). You add up each substitution. Thus, on the righthand side (the sum of the series) there shouldn’t be any m’s, just n’s.
Thanks for a nerdy comic Doug!
regarding the similarity of conversation and unsolvable equations:
guy: “I’m fine”
translation: “I’m fine”
girl: “I’m fine”
translation: “I’ll get you for this you bastard…”
ugh! we’re doing that right now in calculus! curse you calculus! you follow me everywhere!!!