I would have thought the relationship would be different:
1. Nonlinear instead of linear. (but might look linear if plotted onto a logarithmic axes)
2. Negative slope (“derivative” is better term): the bigger the fool, the less pity Mr. T would have.
Also, isn’t the proper term (or pronunciation) “foo’” instead of “fool”?
Now I would have thought the ratio between the pity and the fool would have been exponential (rather than linear.) Guess there wasn’t as much pity as I thought.
That’s a good chart, looks like Mr T is enjoying being a Maths Teacher
: )
Ohh, I see. The more a fool I am, the more pity I get. Perfect.
But what about if your name happens to be “Owa Tafoo Liam” Do you still fall in the Pity:Fool Ratio? Just asking…
singing ~and I pity the fool who disagrees~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCtKsvYbvIw
I love the look on Chickens face. You can almost hear him thinking “Oh, I GET it now!”
I would have thought the relationship would be different:
1. Nonlinear instead of linear. (but might look linear if plotted onto a logarithmic axes)
2. Negative slope (“derivative” is better term): the bigger the fool, the less pity Mr. T would have.
Also, isn’t the proper term (or pronunciation) “foo’” instead of “fool”?
Love Mr. T.
I can always explain things better with lots of charts and graphs.
Now I would have thought the ratio between the pity and the fool would have been exponential (rather than linear.) Guess there wasn’t as much pity as I thought.
“Teachin’ fools some basic rules! (I pity the fool)”
N6VGP
HAHA, that’s awesome. So scientific, yet so simple.
did you hear about Mr.T’s recent meeting with former president Bush?
he left crying
Apparently, the greater the fool, the greater the pity