Cartoons

Feed the Chickens

Please support the site!

Monday, March 26, 2007

The Problem

Savage Chickens - The Problem

More math.

[Technorati tags: , , , , ]

Stumble It!  Digg This!  Add to Del.icio.us  Email It!

11 Comments:

At March 26, 2007 1:13 AM, Blogger Mary Pat said...

I was going to asked why 21n^2n wasn't simplified to 21n^3, but I now realize that 1 was an l. (and then I flashed back to the freshman calculus class I taught where someone simplified (sin x)/x = sin.)

It's stuff like that that made me always do a cursive l when I did math. And put a line through my zs.

 
At March 26, 2007 2:13 AM, Blogger The Freelance Cynic said...

Wow. wouldn't conversation be amazing if it was like that.

'I say Roger, the Sum total of 1 over 1 to the minus n multiplied by 1 to the minus n' is equal to just 1 don't you know?'

'Why no! How very intersting. How very interesting squared infact...'

 
At March 26, 2007 4:52 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mary Pat - that was way to much information! But can you tell me the square root of a right triangle times the widith of a 3 year old Oak Tree in a Moutain Range 3 Million Years old, time the radius of a quadrilateral's 5th dimention, plus all of space and time divided by X?

 
At March 26, 2007 5:38 AM, Blogger chikzrkul said...

If math is a foreign language, then I'm using the tourist dictionary. I do good just to use the basic functions of the whole mess. I'm still trying to figure out how I passed high school algebra with a B...I don't remember getting grades that high!

 
At March 26, 2007 9:23 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The answer is 42.

 
At March 26, 2007 9:58 AM, Blogger Robert Johnson said...

What Mary said. I used to write the "ln" in cursive to indicate natural log to keep things clear. Anyway, I don't remember that equation at MIT. We didn't advance into chicken math.

 
At March 26, 2007 10:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Something's wrong with the look on that chicken's face...

She's hallucinating!

 
At March 26, 2007 11:47 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shouldn't there be an m on the right hand of the equation or did I miss it in the chicken scratch writing of the equation?

 
At March 26, 2007 2:34 PM, Blogger Ada said...

Anon 11:47 - no there shouldn't. This is a series, meaning you substitute a number where you see an m on the lefthand side of the equation, starting at m=3 and going to m=(n/2). You add up each substitution. Thus, on the righthand side (the sum of the series) there shouldn't be any m's, just n's.

Thanks for a nerdy comic Doug!

 
At March 26, 2007 7:22 PM, Anonymous Ben Therdunthat said...

regarding the similarity of conversation and unsolvable equations:

guy: "I'm fine"
translation: "I'm fine"

girl: "I'm fine"
translation: "I'll get you for this you bastard..."

 
At April 12, 2007 11:56 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

ugh! we're doing that right now in calculus! curse you calculus! you follow me everywhere!!!

 

Post a Comment



Links to this cartoon:

Create a Link

<< Home

This Month's Most Popular T-Shirt

Powered by LiquidWeb

Want to advertise?